Radeon R7 M370 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R7 M370 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R7 M370 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M370 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M370.
- Radeon R7 M370 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M370 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 301 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2132 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Radeon R7 M370 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Litho | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 690 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |