Radeon R9 M280X vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M280X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M280X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M280X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M280X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M280X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Saturn XT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |