Radeon R9 M365X vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M365X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- Radeon R9 M365X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M365X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2007 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Tropo | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |