Radeon R9 M380 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R9 M380 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R9 M380 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M380 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M380 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M380 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M380 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M380.
- Radeon R9 M380 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M380 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M380 is 426 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1632 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M380.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Fortnite is 119% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M380 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Strato Pro GDDR5 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 194 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |