Radeon R9 M390X vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R9 M390X stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M390X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M390X is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 318% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 180% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 420% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 322% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |