Radeon R9 M395X vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 11% more power consumption, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M395X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Radeon R9 M395X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M395X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1882 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 336% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 204% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 480% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 90% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 271% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Amethyst XT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |