Radeon R9 M470 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M470 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M470 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M470 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M470 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M470.
- Radeon R9 M470 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M470 is build with GCN 2 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 426 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M470 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M470 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| Radeon R9 M470 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Fortnite is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M470 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Saturn | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 May 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |