Radeon RX 460 mobile vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 309% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 119% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 8 August 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.08 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,115 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |