Radeon RX 640 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between Radeon RX 640 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon RX 640 and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX 640 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- Radeon RX 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 640.
- Radeon RX 640 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 640 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 644 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon RX 640 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 640 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX 640 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1218 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |