Tesla C2075 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Tesla C2075 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Tesla C2075 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
Tesla C2075
Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 and Tesla M2070 Q have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Tesla C2075 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
Tesla C2075 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 248 mm.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 and Tesla M2070 Q is 3132 MHz.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
1−2
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
27−30
8−9
ultra / 1080p
21−24
6−7
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
50−55
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
190−200
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
50−55
QHD / 1440p
65−70
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
high / 768p
150−160
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
21−24
4−5
ultra / 1080p
18−20
4−5
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
low / 720p
45−50
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
110−120
60−65
medium / 1080p
60−65
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
27−30
8−9
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
90−95
50−55
medium / 768p
80−85
−
high / 1080p
30−35
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
10−12
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
9−10
medium / 1080p
14−16
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
60−65
20−22
medium / 768p
35−40
12−14
high / 1080p
21−24
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
35−40
18−20
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Full Specs
Tesla C2075
Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Fermi
Code name
GF110
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
25 July 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
448
448
Core clock speed
574 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
1,027.7 gflops
Length
248 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
3132 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
