Tesla M2070 Q vs UHD Graphics 620
When choosing between Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics 620, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics 620.
Tesla M2070 Q
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
| Tesla M2070 Q | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- Tesla M2070 Q is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 26 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Tesla M2070 Q is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- Tesla M2070 Q is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- Tesla M2070 Q is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 31% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 13% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
Full Specs
| Tesla M2070 Q | UHD Graphics 620 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | GF100 | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 448 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |