FireStream 9250 vs Tesla M6
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Tesla M6. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Tesla M6. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Tesla M6
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than Tesla M6.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 7 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 305 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 780% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 733% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Tesla M6. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 920% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 452% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 590% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 309% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 1075% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 566% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 737% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |