FireStream 9370 vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than Tesla M6.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 105 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 147% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 133% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 204% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Cypress | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |