GeForce GT 645M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between GeForce GT 645M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 645M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 212% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- GeForce GT 645M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 900% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 1042% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 645M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 645M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 573% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 962% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 437% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 2250% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1025% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1480% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N13P-GS | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Tesla M6 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100