GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 90 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 2988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 5.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |