GeForce GTX 680M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 680M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 210 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 139% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GTX | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 4 June 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion/sec | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M
- Tesla M6 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- Tesla M6 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100