Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Tesla M6
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 630 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 627% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 227% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 750% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 450% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 672% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 326% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 542% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 690% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Tesla M6 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100