Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Tesla M6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla M6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 655 stacks up against Tesla M6, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M6
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 630 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 147% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 204% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |