Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 122% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 120 GB more memory, than Tesla M6.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 730 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 294% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 223% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 305% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 337% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 318% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 40 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Tesla M6 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100