Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Tesla M6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla M6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Tesla M6, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M6
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 630 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 627% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 207% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 628% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 400% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 553% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 326% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 462% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 690% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Tesla M6 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Tesla M6 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Tesla M6 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100