Quadro 3000M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 480 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 4387 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 780% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 788% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 3000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 1175% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 487% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 800% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 377% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1240% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 62% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |