Quadro K2000D vs Tesla M6

When choosing between Quadro K2000D and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000D and Tesla M6.

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Tesla M6

Main Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Tesla M6
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

Tesla M6 has 96% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 24 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Quadro K2000D and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 1012 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	20−22
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	18−20	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	12−14	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	20−22
low / 720p	27−30	110−120
medium / 1080p	14−16	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 368% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	140−150	250−260
medium / 768p	110−120	220−230
ultra / 1080p	55−60	190−200
QHD / 1440p	30−35	120−130
4K / 2160p	27−30	75−80
high / 768p	85−90	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	110−120
ultra / 1080p	35−40	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	9−10	50−55
ultra / 1080p	8−9	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	85−90
medium / 1080p	10−11	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 363% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	65−70
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	65−70	190−200
medium / 1080p	24−27	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 266% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	14−16	65−70
ultra / 1080p	12−14	50−55
QHD / 1440p	2−3	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	27−30	110−120
medium / 1080p	14−16	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 392% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	140−150
medium / 768p	50−55	130−140
high / 1080p	14−16	75−80
ultra / 1080p	7−8	35−40
QHD / 1440p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 196% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	14−16	75−80
medium / 1080p	7−8	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	95−100	130−140
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	14−16	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−12	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	27−30	140−150
medium / 768p	18−20	90−95
high / 1080p	10−11	50−55
ultra / 1080p	7−8	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 378% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	55−60
high / 768p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro K2000D.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Tesla M6
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 March 2013	30 August 2015
Pipelines	384	1536
Core clock speed	954 MHz	930 MHz
Boost Clock		1180 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	113.3
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	3,625 gflops
Length	202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s
	Check Price

Quadro K2000D vs Tesla M6

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares