Quadro K4100M vs Tesla M6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K4100M and Tesla M6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K4100M stacks up against Tesla M6, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M6
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
- Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 224 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 1812 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 225% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 240% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 218% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 161% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 213% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 235% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K4100M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |