Quadro M2000M vs Tesla M6
When choosing between Quadro M2000M and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2000M and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 81% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 108 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- Quadro M2000M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 118% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M2000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 108% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 91% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |