Quadro M3000M vs Tesla M6
When choosing between Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M3000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 120 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Quadro M3000M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M3000M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1,024 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |