Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Tesla M6
When comparing Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla M6, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla M6 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M6
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 2988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
Quadro T2000 Max Q and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro T2000 Max Q. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 Max Q | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 930 / 1200 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 / 1620 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 5.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |