Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla M6
When comparing Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla M6, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla M6 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M6
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 455 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 108% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 134% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 455. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 11 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 October 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.04 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |