Radeon Pro 555X vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 555X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 555X | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Radeon Pro 555X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Radeon Pro 555X is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 555X is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 68 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 104% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 110% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 139% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 555X | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.54 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |