Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Tesla M6
When choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 988 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 368% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 363% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 266% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 392% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 196% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 378% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 21 March 2018 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |