Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Tesla M6
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla M6. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla M6. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M6
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 53% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is connected by IGP, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 1 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3612 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 110% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 131% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2018 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Check Price |