FirePro M4100 vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4100 and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4100 stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 113 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- FirePro M4100 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M60. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1150% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 468% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 730% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 372% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 780% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 971% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |