FirePro M5100 vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between FirePro M5100 and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 168 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- FirePro M5100 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M5100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 231% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 186% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 247% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 255% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Venus | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |