FirePro W7170M vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 166 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- FirePro W7170M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 93% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W7170M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 68% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 93% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |