FireStream 9250 vs Tesla M60
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Tesla M60.
FireStream 9250
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 100% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 68 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 760% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 711% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Tesla M60. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 435% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 572% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1025% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | RV770 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |