GeForce GT 750M vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 500% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 410 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GT 750M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 442% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 461% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 455% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 327% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 423% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 269% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 680% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 450% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 540% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce GT 750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |