GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 743 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M60 is 259 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3312 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 284% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 312% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 276% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |