GeForce GTX 950M vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950M and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 950M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 357 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 950M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4012 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 192% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 124% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 230% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N16P-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |