GeForce GTX 960M vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 539 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 2512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N16P-GX | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |