GeForce MX350 vs Tesla M60
When comparing GeForce MX350 and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX350 and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 797 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 1988 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 152% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 138% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 106% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 153% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 123% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 146% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce MX350. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX350 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |