Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 120 GB more memory, than Tesla M60.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M60 is 357 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 284% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 211% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 169% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 312% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 40 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |