Quadro 2000M vs Tesla M60
When comparing Quadro 2000M and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000M and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 445% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M60 is 7 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4112 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro 2000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Fermi | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |