Quadro 5010M vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Quadro 5010M and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 5010M and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5010M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M60 is 107 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3712 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 247% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 202% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 312% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 276% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N12E-Q5 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |