Quadro K2000 vs Tesla M60

In this comparison between Quadro K2000 and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2000 Check Price

Tesla M60

Main Specs

	Quadro K2000	Tesla M60
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	300 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

Tesla M60 has 488% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 397 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Quadro K2000 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Tesla M60 is 65 mm longer, than Quadro K2000.
Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1012 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	9−10	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 377% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	12−14	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	24−27	110−120
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 386% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	140−150	250−260
medium / 768p	110−120	220−230
ultra / 1080p	55−60	180−190
QHD / 1440p	30−35	110−120
4K / 2160p	27−30	70−75
high / 768p	85−90	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	110−120
ultra / 1080p	35−40	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	9−10	45−50
ultra / 1080p	8−9	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	20−22	85−90
medium / 1080p	9−10	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	60−65	180−190
medium / 1080p	24−27	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 278% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	12−14	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	45−50
QHD / 1440p	1−2	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	27−30	110−120
medium / 1080p	14−16	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 407% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	55−60	140−150
medium / 768p	45−50	130−140
high / 1080p	12−14	75−80
ultra / 1080p	7−8	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	3−4	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	7−8	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 457% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	95−100	130−140
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	27−30	130−140
medium / 768p	18−20	85−90
high / 1080p	10−11	50−55
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 357% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	55−60
high / 768p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro K2000.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2000	Tesla M60
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 March 2013	30 August 2015
Pipelines	384	2048
Core clock speed	954 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	150.8
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	2x 4,833 gflops
Length	202 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	24 Mh/s	432 Mh/s
	Check Price

Quadro K2000 vs Tesla M60

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares