Quadro K2000M vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Quadro K2000M and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000M and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 445% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 188 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro K2000M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3212 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Quadro K2000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla M60. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1350% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 722% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 431% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 780% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 971% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Quadro K2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14P-Q3 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |