Quadro K2100M vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Quadro K2100M and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2100M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2100M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 445% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro K2100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2100M.
- Quadro K2100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 110 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro K2100M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 2012 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 437% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 461% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 307% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 246% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 476% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Quadro K2100M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2100M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GK106 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 576 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |