Quadro K3100M vs Tesla M60
When comparing Quadro K3100M and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3100M and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3100M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro K3100M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1812 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 165% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 214% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 153% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K3100M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3100M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |