Quadro K5100M vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K5100M and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K5100M and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- Quadro K5100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K5100M and Tesla M60 have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
- Quadro K5100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K5100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 214 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro K5100M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1412 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 153% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 163% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 116% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 107% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 123% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q5-A2 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |