Quadro M2000M vs Tesla M60
When comparing Quadro M2000M and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2000M and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 445% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 481 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro M2000M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 106% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M2000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 90% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |