Quadro M2200 vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2200 and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2200 stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 445% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 137 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro M2200 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 496 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 65% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2200 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M2200 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 62% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 51% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 63% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 72% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 64% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |