Quadro M4000M vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M4000M stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000M.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 418 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 is 5012 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 7% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 3% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 10% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Quadro M4000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1,280 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |